|
Neurobiology and Behavior
Eric R. Kandel, M.D., Director
Michael E. Goldberg, M.D., Research Scientist VIII
James H. Schwartz, M.D., Ph.D., Research Scientist VII
John Koester, Ph.D., Research Scientist VII
Claude Ghez, M.D., Research Scientist VI
René Hen, Ph.D., Research Scientist Vi
Craig Bailey, Ph.D., Research Scientist V
Robert Hawkins, Ph.D., Research Scientist V
Samuel Schacher, Ph.D., Research Scientist V
John Martin, Ph.D., Research Scientist III
Steven Siegelbaum, Ph.D., Professor
Lorna Role, Ph.D., Professor
Ning Qian, Ph.D., Associate Professor
Aniruddha Das, Ph.D., Assistant Professor
Vincent Ferrera, Ph.D., Assistant Professor
Jacqueline Gottlieb, Ph.D., Assistant Professor
Daniel Salzman, M.D. Ph.D., Assistant Professor
The Center for Neurobiology and Behavior consists of 17 independent basic
research laboratories, including two laboratories of the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute. The overall research goal of the Center is to provide an analysis of
neural development, behavior, learning, and diseases of the nervous system in
terms of their underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. The subjects used
in these studies range from simple invertebrates to humans. A wide range of
experimental techniques are used, including molecular genetics, neurochemistry,
cell biology, biophysics, behavior, electrophysiology and psychophysics.
Research is carried out in an interactive environment, in which
interdisciplinary collaboration between faculty, fellows and graduate students
in different laboratories is the norm. The Center runs an active training
program for medical and graduate students and postdoctoral fellows.
The Mahoney Center for Mind and Brain, a part of the Keck Program on Cognition
and Plasticity, was built this year, and will be formally opened in September
2002. New laboratories for Michael Goldberg, Ning Qian, Vincent Fererra,
Jacqueline Gottlieb, Daniel Salzman, and Aniruddah Das were constructed adjacent
to the rest of the Center for Neurobiology and Behavior. A series of
state-of-the-art laboratories were built to allow the investigators to study the
physiology and psychophysics of perception and action, using awake, behaving
primates as a primary model. They will form a new and vibrant program in systems
and cognitive neuroscience. Extramural research for research in the Center is
provided by NIH, NSF, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Keck Foundation,
the Dana Foundation, the Klosk Foundation, NARSAD, and the Matheson Foundation.
Learning and Memory
A cross-species approach to understanding the mechanisms of memory and learning
has been applied, using: (1) the defensive gill and siphon withdrawal reflex of
the sea hare, Aplysia californica, which undergoes habituation, sensitization,
and classical conditioning; (2) the mammalian hippocampus, which exhibits a
pronounced type of long-lasting synaptic plasticity, long term potentiation (LTP),
which is thought to underlie long term memory. James Schwartz and colleagues
have characterized second-messenger cascades that mediate simple forms of
synaptic plasticity underlying learning in Aplysia. There are two basic forms of
synaptic plasticity — facilitation and depression. In the past, Dr. Schwartz and
colleagues have studied the molecular pathway for long-term facilitatory
processes that underlie memory. They found it to be governed primarily by the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Recently they have begun to examine the molecular
basis of synaptic depression, which involves p38 MAP kinase.
Craig Bailey and colleagues have examined the structural changes that accompany
long-term facilitation in Aplysia as well as their specific relationship to the
changes in synaptic function. They have found that the synaptic enhancement that
underlies long-term facilitation consists of both an activation of preexisting
silent synapses and the growth of new functional synapses.
Synapse formation and long-term synaptic plasticity accompanying simple forms of
learning are believed to share some common mechanisms. Samuel Schacher and
colleagues have recently found that specific changes in the intracellular
distribution of the mRNA that encodes synaptic proteins contribute both to the
formation of specific synapses between appropriate partners and to
activity-dependent synaptic plasticity that accompanies long-term changes in
behavior.
Robert Hawkins and colleagues have continued to study cellular mechanisms of
learning and memory. They showed that classical conditioning in Aplysia is due
in part to associative facilitation of sensory neuron–motor neuron postsynaptic
potentials, and found that that facilitation in turn involves both
activity-dependent presynaptic facilitation and Hebbian long-term potentiation.
In hippocampus they have found that long-term potentiation of synaptic
transmission in dissociated cell cultures is accompanied by a rapid and
long-lasting increase in the number of clusters of presynaptic proteins such as
synaptophysin, as well as clusters of postsynaptic proteins such as glutamate
receptors. These studies support the emerging view that even the early stages of
long-term plasticity involve microstructural changes, and that those changes
occur pre- and postsynaptically in a coordinated manner.
In studies of synaptic plasticity Eric Kandel has focused on the studies of the
cyclic AMP-response element binding protein (CREB) in the mouse. When present in
the phosphorylated state CREB binds to the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) in
certain genes, thereby enhancing their transcription. Members of the Kandel lab
have interfered with CREB-family transcription factors in region CA1 of the
dorsal hippocampus. This produces a behavioral deficit specific to long-term
memory of spatial learning. Several forms of particularly long-lasting
(late-phase) LTP (L-LTP) are normal, but dopamine-regulated potentiation is
disrupted. These experiments both confirm a role for CREB in
hippocampus-dependent learning, and suggest that some forms of synaptic
plasticity bypass the requirement for CREB. Parallel studies suggest that
synaptic capture of CRE-driven gene products may be sufficient for consolidation
of LTP, providing insight into the molecular mechanisms of the synaptic tagging
required to produce synapse-specific potentiation.
Behavior and Cognition
The smooth pursuit eye movement system of primates is an excellent model for
studying the interactions between attention and voluntary movement selection.
Dr. Ferrera and colleagues study the neural basis of smooth pursuit and saccadic
eye movements by recording single neuron activity in prefrontal cortex of
non-human primates. Using a behavioral paradigm for measuring the eye movement
response to two or more moving targets, they have characterized the process of
target selection as a transition from vector-averaging to winner-take-all motor
output.
Stereovision is the perception of depth using information projected onto the two
retinas. There have been many physiological studies of this phenomenon, but the
relation between them is often not clear. Dr. Qian and his collaborators have
performed mathematical analyses and computer simulations on the data from a wide
range of physiological studies. They have developed a unified computational
model that fits data from a wide range of such studies and generates specific,
testable hypotheses to help guide future investigations of stereovision.
Dr. Ghez’s research examines the mechanisms of trajectory control and motor
learning in reaching and pointing movements. His recent studies have shown that
trajectory errors, detected through visual and proprioceptive sensory channels,
are decomposed and stored in multiple memory buffers used in feedback control
and adaptive learning. Thus visual and proprioceptive errors are used for
adapting internal models of extrinsic and intrinsic space respectively. Visual
errors are partitioned into specialized buffers devoted either to discrete
processing for the learning of sequences or to the calibration of visuomotor
reference-axis and scaling. Brain imaging studies have revealed that these
psychophysical distinctions are mirrored in distinct prefrontal, premotor
parietal and subcortical networks during learning.
René Hen uses molecular genetic techniques to create animal models to examine
the role of serotonin in anxiety and depression. Serotonergic drugs are used in
the treatment of a number of pathological states such as depression, appetite
disorders, and migraines. There are 14 known subtypes of serotonin receptors
with distinct pharmacological properties, signaling systems, and tissue
distributions. The study of the function of individual serotonin receptor
subtypes has been hampered by the lack of specific drugs. In addition, a number
of the serotonergic drugs that are active in the treatment of neuropsychiatric
disorders influence the whole serotonergic system. To dissect the contributions
of individual serotonin receptors to mood control, Dr, Hen and his collaborators
have used genetic engineering techniques to generate mice that carry mutations
in specific receptor subtypes that result in altered emotional states.
Tissue-specific and inducible strategies have been used to identify neural
circuits that underlie mood control and responses to antidepressant therapies.
Hyperpolarization-activated ion channels underlie spontaneous electrical
activity in both the heart and certain regions of the brain. A key feature of
these channels is that their activity is regulated by the direct binding of the
intracellular metabolite, cyclic AMP, to a site on the internal surface of the
channel. Steven Siegelbaum and colleagues have begun to elucidate the mechanism
of this regulatory action. Their results show that the cyclic AMP-binding domain
exerts a tonic, inhibitory influence on channel opening. The binding of cyclic
AMP to its receptor on the channel promotes channel opening by relieving this
inhibition. This effect underlies the ability of modulatory neurotransmitters to
regulate both cardiac and neuronal electrical rhythms.
In order to understand the control of behavior, one must understand not only the
synaptic connections in a circuit, but also the ways in which voltage-gated ion
channels endow different neurons with their unique response properties to a
given set of synaptic inputs. John Koester uses voltage-clamp techniques to
study the excitability properties of Aplysia neurons that have defined roles in
generating behavior. Together with the late Irving Kupfermann and collaborators,
he has analyzed the functional properties of membrane ionic currents in an
unusual class of non-spiking neurons that play a key role in generating rhythmic
feeding behavior.
Development
Jack Martin studies postnatal development of the corticospinal system – the
principal neural system for producing skilled movement. He and his collaborators
have focused on the role of behavioral experiences during early postnatal life
in shaping development of the corticospinal system and development of skilled
motor behavior. By restricting limb use in young animals they have produced
profound retardation of corticospinal development, both in the organization of
the cortical motor map and in the patterns of connections with spinal cord
neurons. Current studies examine which features of retarded corticospinal
organization can be corrected later in development and which are permanent. In
addition to providing direct evidence for the role of experience in
corticospinal development, their findings suggest a possible treatment for
developmental motor disorders such as cerebral palsy. Dr. Martin and colleagues
have also begun to pursue surgical and immunological lines of research aimed at
promoting recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury. These studies are
providing insights into the control of axon growth in maturity that may lead to
effective treatments for injury of the nervous system.
Central cholinergic systems, which provide important modulatory control of
synaptic excitability, have been strongly implicated in neuropsychiatric
diseases. Lorna Role’s laboratory studies the generation, plasticity and
maintenance of cholinergic synapses in the mammalian brain. Recent work tests
the hypothesis that products of the neuregulin-1 gene are important in the
susceptibility to such diseases. Recent studies in the Role lab demonstrated
that neuregulin-1-signaling is bi-directional and that neuregulin-1-expressing
neurons require such signaling to survive. Current work further examines the
signaling cascades and target genes activated by NRG-1-erb B interactions. The
role of neuroregulin-1 signaling in synaptic function is also being studied in
mice genetically altered to express reduced levels of functional neuregulin-1
protein. As the neuregulin-1 gene has recently been identified as a potential
susceptibility locus for schizophrenia, current work may provide important
insight into mechanisms that may underlie this and other neuropsychiatric
disorders.
|